It is implicit in the opinions of the Advisory
Committee on this subject that the representation of defendants
in criminal matters is voluntary on the part of the city or village
attorney and presumably undertaken for compensation, and the ethical
prohibition extends to that situation. A different case is presented
where a judge appoints a lawyer who happens to be a city or village
attorney to represent a person charged with a crime.
The Committee does not feel that a court can or
should be bound by the limitation imposed under the Code upon an
attorney's voluntary action, where the court is discharging its
obligations to make representation available to accused persons.
Hence, Opinions No. 72-13 should
not be construed as pertaining to a situation where a city or village
attorney is appointed by a judge to defend a person accused of a
crime.